Innovating The Next Big Thing September 6, 2010 ph.gif
ph.gif
Sections

Enterprise Mobility
Mobile Telecom & mCommerce
Wireless Web
PDAs, Phones & Smart Devices
Mobile Arts & Entertainment
Mobile & Ultramobile PCs
Safety & Security
Voice & Speech Technology
The Next Interface
Remembering 9/11
Reader Reactions
About

Our Publications

TechnologyInnovator
EnterpriseInnovator
SecurityInnovator
WirelessInnovator 

Contact

• NextInnovator(at)Live.com
• No spam, subscription newsletters, solicitations, or attachments please!
• Attn: Harold Abraham, Chief Innovator

WirelessInnovator Headlines

SmartPhone Headline News
PDA Headline News
3G Headline News
Bluetooth Headline News
WiFi, WiMAX & WAN Headline News
Tablet Headline News
Laptop Headline News

Next Innovators

Over the River
eMarketer 
TechnologyPundits
Security Insights Blog 
McAfee AudioParasitics
Strand Consult
Ovum
The Eye For Innovation
Rethink Research
• Innovation Insights
Innoblog
Strategy and Innovation
The Gadgeteer
Handheld Speech
Ghost City

Writers Wanted

Writers Wanted

Amazon Ads: Cell Phones & Plans

Amazon Ads: PDAs and Handhelds

Amazon Ads: Notebooks

Amazon Ads: Computer Peripherals

Amazon Ads: Desktop PCs

Feedjit Live Web Stats


McAfee AudioParasitics


 
Ads

ph.gif ph.gif
Mobile Telecom & mCommerce Wireless Watch: The new Clearwire is finally born, with Intel, Google and cable in tow
May 7, 2008 – Rethink Research

So Sprint Nextel and Clearwire finally created their much anticipated joint venture, keeping the hopes for a genuine mobile broadband challenge to the US telcos alive, and striking a blow for WiMAX, even if that proves of more psychological than financial value to the suppliers.  
 
The months of speculation over which companies would step up to inject much needed new cash into the venture have ended with just about all the serious candidates taking part – Intel, Google, and three of Sprint’s former cableco partners in the failed Pivot venture (Comcast, Time Warner and BrightHouse Networks, but not Cox, which seems to be plowing its own wireless furrow with its own spectrum, and is reportedly working with Huawei). These new backers will add $3.2bn to the warchest of the enlarged Clearwire, which will run as a separate entity and has a total funding of $14.5bn.  
 
By keeping its Xohm mobile broadband vision alive, Sprint has saved itself from a slow spiraling death, taking 51% ownership in the new venture. In one fell swoop the company has secured its own future network capability but offloaded around $3.2bn, potentially all the remaining cost, of building out the network. The five new investors share 22% of the venture and Clearwire shareholders retain just 27%.  
 
Both Sprint and Clearwire shares rose on announcement of the deal, with Clearwire up as much as 12% early on Wednesday. The transaction will close in the fourth quarter this year and Sprint, Comcast, Time Warner Cable and Bright House will each enter wholesale agreements with Clearwire to sell high speed wireless services using the Clearwire network. It is unclear where that leaves the cablecos’ satellite rivals, Dish Network and DirecTV, which also have rights to sell the Clearwire network - perhaps they might be limited to fixed wireless sales?  
 
The deal, therefore, is important to both Sprint and Clearwire. Both have strong visions and a deployment headstart on AT&T and Verizon, in terms of providing a network to support mobile broadband services and fixed/mobile convergence. But both were running dangerously short of the cash to support a roll-out of the ambition required to make a dent on those telcos, especially now they are poised to ramp up current network upgrades and moves to LTE and fiber. By putting Sprint’s Xohm unit into Clearwire, the vision – possibly the best articulated concept of how an open access, 4G-class mobile internet model could actually work – is preserved, along with some key executives who have been guardians of that vision throughout the past year of hesitancy and mismanagement at Sprint, notably Xohm chief and long time Nextel CTO, Barry West. But by coming under Clearwire’s wing, Xohm also gains the operational advantages that were so lacking at Sprint, where vision has not been matched by execution for some time, and where a cowardly board and weak management threatened to kill Xohm, despite being Sprint’s greatest asset (both in terms of the value of its spectrum, and its potential to be the basis of a long term business model). By contrast, although Clearwire was forced to scale back build-out schedules after the collapse last year of its original – and less sweeping – alliance plan with Sprint, it has been prudent in its roll-outs, has executed well in the markets where it has launched, and inspires the confidence due to a company with a management team well versed in this business, and with the legendary wireless entrepreneur and dealmaker Craig McCaw at the helm.  
 
Intel’s interest in taking part is obvious – Sprint and Clearwire have been the showcase operators for WiMAX in developed markets (apart from Korea Telecom, but Intel has some political issues with the huge influence of KT supplier Samsung in WiMAX, even though Samsung is also a vendor to Sprint Xohm). We actually still believe the real pickings for WiMAX will be in emerging economies where there is little or no entrenched 3G interest (see separate item on India), and where its fixed broadband capabilities will give it an edge over the highly mobile-centric agenda for LTE. But to win vendor and investor confidence, and try to lure large operators, ISPs and media players in developed markets, Intel had to demonstrate that the technology on which it has pinned so many of its hopes for new revenue streams and increased market influence could perform in a true mobile broadband environment, and hold its own against 3G. Keeping that promise alive will certainly be worth the investment, in the Intel world view at least, since failure of WiMAX would leave the emerging mobile broadband world based on technologies like HSPA and LTE, in which Intel would always be playing catch-up. Intel’s close vendor partner, Motorola, will also welcome a rare piece of good news, since it is a supplier to both Sprint and Clearwire and an investor in the latter, making it the dominant vendor in the new company.  
 
Google, of course, is accustomed to making token investments in technologies and companies that it believes will further the cause of an open access internet, delivering its advertising and services consistently across all manner of networks and devices to give it close to universal reach. Though often credited with ambitions to become an operator itself, in fact it prefers to put its financial and marketing weight behind other companies that serve its agenda, with its municipal Wi-Fi experiments, its successful manoeuvring to get part of the 700MHz spectrum mandated for open access, and now its Clearwire stake, all part of that process. Google has also been working with Sprint on creating the user interface and software environment for Xohm, which will presumably be based on its Android open source platform and extended to Clearwire. The more successful Clearwire can be, the more valuable in establishing Android as a major contender among the many bids to set open mobile internet software standards. This highlights a key benefit for the original Clearwire from the JV – apart from gaining scale and financing, it also gains Xohm’s work with device and software makers, an area where it had made only very small steps in its own right, lacking Sprint’s experience of dealing with large phonemakers. Nokia recently announced a WiMAX version of its flagship internet tablet for Xohm.  
 
The three cablecos are both the highlight and the greatest risk in the new partnership. The downside is the prospect that, as with the Pivot venture, there may be too many culturally and commercially different players all seeking to drive Clearwire, and this could lead to slow decision making and confusion at a time when it will be vital to maintain a lead over the plans of the more decisive Verizon Wireless and AT&T Mobility. However, the cablecos need to add a wireless strand to their offerings in order to compete in converged services and the quad play, and so they will bring real commitment, strong financial reserves, customer bases, brands and alliances with content providers – all vital to ensuring that the new Clearwire maintains its momentum now its dangerously long hiatus period is over. The cablecos have been considering many joint or several ways to get into wireless, but this is certainly the most logical, representing low cost and risk to shareholders compared to building their own networks, but with greater control and a more cutting edge technology than a simple MVNO deal with a cellco would provide (see Wireless Watch April 29 2008).  
 
While swift action and good management could make Clearwire a genuinely disruptive force in US telecoms and media - and with a better shot at early profitability on mobile internet services than the LTE players, because of its lack of legacy networks – the prospects may be less good for the rest of Sprint Nextel, and the future of the company remains in great doubt. Even as the Clearwire venture was unveiled, there was still mounting speculation that Deutsche Telekom was interested in making a bid for Sprint, a move that might seem even more attractive now (though possibly more expensive if Sprint continues to benefit from the confidence boost of its Clearwire move). The German telco would look to merge Sprint Nextel with its T-Mobile USA operation, which is a major contributor to the group’s growth and cashflow, but has a difficult transition ahead, as it is only just starting to build out 3G, having acquired spectrum in 2006, while its larger rivals are already considering 4G plans. A 51% stake in Clearwire would give T-Mobile USA a readymade 4G roadmap to complement its innovative work in fixed/mobile convergence using Wi-Fi hotspots and dual-mode handsets. However, it would also take on a Sprint legacy of a CDMA network incompatible with T-Mobile’s GSM/W-CDMA; a terrible recent customer service and customer retention record that is in sharp contrast with T-Mobile’s strong showing in these areas; and the thorny issue of the rebanding of Nextel’s 800MHz spectrum.  
 
A bid from Deutsche Telekom (or other rumored contenders, including a renewed attack from SKT) would go more smoothly if Sprint bowed to pressure from some investors to divest Nextel. The company is bleeding customers, its technology is ageing – and it must be questionable how long Motorola will continue to support it, despite its margins – and its ‘killer app’, push to talk, is being emulated by Sprint itself with Qchat, and other operators like AT&T. Also, the 3MHz of spectrum that Nextel holds is insufficient for T-Mobile to run W-CDMA, which needs 5MHz, and so would have to be retained for LTE, which works with flexible channel sizes.  
 
On the plus side, T-Mobile would gain a large customer base – 53.8m at the end of 2007 – and even after the Clearwire announcement, would probably gain a bargain route into being the US’ largest cellco. T-Mobile USA had 28.7m customers at the end of last year. Sprint’s market cap is around $22bn.  
 
But Sprint probably needs to offload Nextel, and the rumors that it would sell it to a public safety agency to build the much-needed national emergency response network (a plan scuppered by the failure to sell Block D of the 700MHz spectrum) have revived. The most likely organization to run this would be Cyren Call, set up in 2006 by Morgan O'Brien, one of the co-founders of Nextel. Private equity would be another route for Nextel.

Courtesy Rethink Research, publisher of Wireless Watch, a weekly assessment of the impact of events that have happened this week in the world of wireless and mobile technology.



» Send this article to a friend...
» Comments? Tell us what you think...
» More Mobile Telecom & mCommerce articles...

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Search WirelessInnovator

ph.gif ph.gif
Support This Site



Newest Articles

• 3/6 Faultline: Apple case against HTC could be the defining patent case for touch
• 3/4 Faultline: OTT fever stalks European set top deals – as old school collapses
• 3/3 Wireless Watch: Orange backs MeeGo to support its three-screen content strategy
• 3/3 Wireless Watch: LiMO supports operator software drive, but Vodafone 360 will be litmus test
• 2/23 Rethink Research: Tablets, smartbooks and cloudbooks; the first battlefield in the PC phone wars - Forecasts to 2014
• 2/22 Technology Pundits: Why Microsoft Should Not Be in Consol Gaming Part II
• 2/22 WiMAX Directions: Mobile World Congress: WiMAX community looks to a 2G/4G future
• 2/19 Technology Pundits: Why Microsoft Should Not Be in Console Gaming
• 2/3 WiMAX Directions: WiMAX’ ratings surge, but beware of WiMAX2 confusion
• 1/28 Datamonitor: iPad: Apple takes a bite of the e-books market
• 1/27 Innovation Insights: Does the Apple iPad Make Strategic Sense?
• 1/20 WiMAX Directions: LTE can only dream as WiMAX starts to deliver the flat IP network
• 1/18 Rethink Research: The Rise of the ATSC M/H machines; The Battle for American Mobile TV
• 1/6 WiMAX Directions: CES: Why Apple really does need a WiMAX iSlate
• 1/5 Innovation Insights: The Google Phone's Disruptive Potential
• 12/22 Over The River: Technology finally bites me
• 12/16 Datamonitor: Ovum Research Fellow Offers Insight on Looming Google Phone
• 12/15 WiMAX Directions: WiMAX carriers in good shape for increased competition in 2010
• 12/11 Technology Pundits: If Steve Jobs or Yoda ran Microsoft They Would Abandon Cell Phones
• 12/7 Over The River: WebInno24 Preview
• 10/26 Over The River: Not wowed by Waze . . . yet
• 10/14 Over The River: Licensing is for Software NOT for Literature
• 9/27 Over The River: WebInno23 Preview
• 9/15 Over The River: Photography and Fatherhood
• 9/8 Datamonitor: T-Mobile and Orange move to upset UK status quo
• 8/4 Datamonitor: Smartphone capability tracker: what’s hot and what’s not
• 6/24 Technology Pundits: Apple's Board: Between a Rock and a Hard Place
• 6/19 Technology Pundits: The Battles of Summer: Will the Real Winner Stand Up?
• 6/14 Over The River: Enough with the HD
• 6/9 Technology Pundits: iPhone vs. Pre: iPhone Won, Palm Lost
• 6/4 Technology Pundits: Intel Buys Wind River, does Microsoft buy AMD?
• 5/22 Technology Pundits: The Apple Tablet and the Coming Wave of Smartbooks
• 5/9 Technology Pundits: Google Response to Anti-Trust Investigation Challenged
• 4/28 Technology Pundits: Is the Apple Mac vs. PC Campaign Out of Date and Wrong Headed?
• 2/9 Technology Pundits: Kindle 2 vs. iPod 2; Can Kindle Ramp to iPod's Market Potential?
• 2/6 Technology Pundits: US Stimulus Package Lacks Strong Foundation and Vision for Future
• 11/10 Weekend Laptop Roundup: Sony VAIO 2GHz 13" for $795, more
• 11/10 Smartphone Showdown: BlackBerry Bold vs. iPhone, T-Mobile G1
• 11/3 Life Without Wires: The Future of UWB – the shakeout begins
• 11/3 Hands On with the T-Mobile G1 by HTC: Is it the next iPhone?
• 10/31 eBook Readers Compared
• 10/30 Life Without Wires: Our Eee PC
• 10/24 Technology Pundits: Dell and the Chinese Market
• 10/17 Technology Pundits: T-Mobile Android G1 Dream Phone vs. iPhone vs. Windows Mobile 6.1
• 10/7 Technology Pundits: AMD Shows US the Way with Asset Smart
• 9/22 Technology Pundits: The Repositioning of Acer
• 7/8 Life Without Wires: Sony and Wireless USB?
• 6/17 Life Without Wires: WiMAX or maybe it’s Wi-Min?
• 6/10 Technology Pundits: From Security to Convenience
• 5/28 Faultline: France sticks with its “communal” populist model for DVB-H

AddThis Feed Button

Amazon Ads: More Cell Phones

Ads

ph.gif
ph.gif Top ph.gif

© 2008 WirelessInnovator. All rights reserved.