Innovating The Next Big Thing May 23, 2013 ph.gif
ph.gif
Sections

Telecom & Commerce
Smarter Phones, Devices & Apps
Enterprise Mobility
Wireless Web
Arts & Entertainment
Tablets & Notebooks
Safety & Security
Remembering 9/11
About

Next Innovator Group

TechnologyInnovator
• NextInnovator
EnterpriseInnovator
SecurityInnovator
DefenseInnovator
WirelessInnovator 
• HPinnovator
EnergyInnovator
TransportationInnovator
SMBinnovator (beta)

Contact

• NextInnovator(at)Live.com

Writers Wanted

Writers Wanted

Feedjit Live Web Stats


Next Innovators

Ghost City
Frontline Sentinel
• Innovation Insights
WebInno
Over the River
Enderle Group
Security Insights Blog 
McAfee Audio Parasitics
Rethinking Security
Ovum
iSuppli
Canalys
• eMarketer 
• CRM Help Desk SW 
Rethink Research
The Gadgeteer
Master the Moment

McAfee AudioParasitics


 
Barry's Books

 

Ads

ph.gif ph.gif
Telecom & Commerce Ovum: The connected car: who is driving?
Jun 8, 2012 – Mike Sapien

Verizon has recently made a series of major announcements about its efforts in telematics, with a focus on connected cars. One of these announcements concerned its acquisition of Hughes Telematics, which indicates a strong and growing interest in the connected car market. Telcos such as Verizon, car manufacturers, M2M platform providers, device manufacturers, wireless operators, and various applications and infotainment service providers have all been chasing this market for a long time.

Automobile manufacturers lead many of the current deployments, and promote specific applications such as safety and customer service. The role of wireless operators, however, has been limited: they have a very hard time managing the complexity, detail, and flexibility required for connected car applications. As with many M2M applications, there are many different business models, and much fragmentation in the various solutions.

Although Verizon has stepped up its game in telematics, it is clear that there will be two primary mobile connections in the car: one from the manufacturer, and one from the end user. Operators will need to address these connections with different business models.

Auto manufacturers will require a connection for specific applications

During the past year, auto manufacturers, especially luxury manufacturers, have been promoting broader deployment of connected car programs. These programs have increased the demand for global coverage and centralized platforms to support global availability. Many of the basic features and services require lower bandwidth, but increase safety, improve customer service, meet regulatory requirements, or support maintenance programs for the car itself. Although many wireless operators have been participating in these programs, the global requirements and complexity tend to give M2M wireless aggregators the advantage. It is also clear that it is the auto manufacturers that will have the relationship with the owner of the car. Verizon has taken a step towards meeting some of the requirements of this sector with its acquisition of Hughes Telematics, but it still has challenges to address. These include providing global coverage, and integrating Hughes Telematics into its organization.

Drivers and passengers have their own agendas and connections

Separate from the auto manufacturer, end users (drivers and passengers) will have different use cases, application needs, and overall requirements for mobile services within the car. They will also prefer, in many cases, to bring their own devices. The end user will come into the car with an existing phone (typically a smartphone), carrier relationship, and mobile service plan that will need to be integrated into the car environment. They will have preferences and applications that they will want to extend to the car, and the car will need to accommodate their choice of device and services. For the optimum user experience the car should be able to adapt and leverage the mobile device and services of the end user. Most drivers will replace their mobile phone and carrier more frequently than replacing their car, which is another reason for the two connections to be separate and distinct.

The connected car market will eventually require an open model

Over time, the connected car market will require an open architecture business model. It must allow for the interoperation and exchange of cars, operators, and device types if it is to gain broader support from both the auto manufacturers and the end users. Drivers and passengers will want a choice of mobile device, and will expect to be able to integrate their device with their car’s features and services. The auto manufacturer may provide basic services and maintain the M2M ecosystem relationships, including with the operator, but ultimately end users will require an open model, and will also continue to shop for “after-market” alternatives. Such an after-market will include many of the infotainment services that are already offered on mobile devices today.

During the recent Verizon-Hughes Telematics briefing there was mention of an after-market offer, which may help Verizon get there faster than most. With its acquisition of Hughes, Verizon is in a much stronger position to tackle the manufacturer-provided device scenario, but it must also ensure it has the user-model scenario well covered through its ownership of network, device, and content assets that continue to make it attractive to drivers and passengers.



» Send this article to a friend...
» Comments? Tell us what you think...
» More Telecom & Commerce articles...

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Comments
blog comments powered by Disqus

Search WirelessInnovator

ph.gif ph.gif
Support This Site



Newest Articles

• 5/10 Ovum: Ovum comments: GB smart meter delay ­ better late than never
• 5/9 Wireless Watch: Microsoft/Nokia alliance at crossroads as both ponder OS futures
• 5/9 Wireless Watch: Apple must rethink far more than the iOS user interface
• 5/9 Faultline: Quantenna gets closer to ST Micro, expect it to get “ascloseasthis”
• 5/9 Faultline: Microsoft volunteers to take Nook, as Barnes and Noble start to breakup
• 5/8 Ovum: Government policy-makers need to create a level playing field for cloud services procurement
• 5/7 Ovum: Analyst View: TPG looks to become Australia’s fourth MNO
• 5/7 Ovum: Analyst view: UK G-Cloud to champion public cloud
• 5/2 Ovum: Analyst view: Facebook’s Q1 2013 results
• 5/2 Wireles Watch: ZigBee Alliance completes Smart Energy Profile 2:
• 5/2 Wireless Watch: AMD, AT&T and Ericsson – wireless value chain shifts to IoT
• 5/2 Faultline: Netflix Hastings predicts OTT world – should stick to profit predictions
• 5/2 Faultline: Ziggo to add 1m homespots by August, work with Liberty Global
• 5/1 Ovum: Ovum says insurers must deploy predictive analytics to navigate through future complexity and chaos
• 4/29 Ovum: Analyst view: Telenor to buy Globul
• 4/29 Ovum: Analyst view: Infosys partnership with IPsoft breaks new ground in service automation
• 4/29 Ovum: Ovum forecasts social messaging apps will cost operators $32.6bn in 2013 growing to over $86.0bn in 2020
• 4/26 Ovum: Informa PLC announces executive management change at Ovum
• 4/25 Wireless Watch: US mobile market continues to shift, but at least there’s new blood this time
• 4/25 Wireless Watch: LTE cannot solve all a cellco’s problems single-handed
• 4/25 Faultline: Verizon, AT&T continue zero sum broadband game, video up
• 4/25 Faultline: CEA says tablets, smartphones on the rise, mobile dominates spending
• 4/24 Ovum: Analyst view: Apple beats financial analysts’ estimates, but is this a good thing in the long term?
• 4/23 Ovum: Ovum recommends CIOs to explore design-thinking techniques for complex ICT projects
• 4/23 Ovum: Analyst view: EE’s Q1 results – it’s all about those LTE numbers
• 4/22 Ovum: Ovum warns telcos not to rush to expand into additional countries
• 4/18 Wireless Watch: Mobile web challengers need far more than HTML5 to destabilize Google
• 4/18 Wireless Watch: Facebook and Google build anti-Apple teams
• 4/18 Faultline: LGI cannot buy KDG – so what’s really going on
• 4/18 Faultline: WiFi offload to become the cellular kingmaker
• 4/17 Ovum: Ovum says look beyond technology to the cultural aspects of gamification
• 4/16 Ovum: ACHIET-Ovum Observatory: Telecoms industry boosts socio-economic development in Latin America
• 4/16 Ovum: Social messaging can be monetized, says Ovum
• 4/16 Ovum: Australian CIOs say cloud services adoption is currently marginal but momentum is building
• 4/12 Ovum: Analyst view: Microsoft softens the blow for businesses struggling to upgrade from Windows XP
• 4/11 Faultline: Swedish Magine cloud to break over Spain and Germany
• 4/11 Ovum: Ovum Industry Congress 2013 will map how agility and innovation can enable businesses to face today’s disruptive trends
• 4/11 Wireless Watch: The new-look RAN ushers in disruptive economics and vendor shake-up
• 4/11 Wireless Watch: Google increasingly isolated in its own Android kingdom
• 4/11 Faultline: Broadcasters move towards IP only delivery, common ecosystem
• 4/9 Ovum: Analyst view: EE is doubling speeds and capacity
• 4/9 Ovum: Ovum warns European retail banks must not ignore social media
• 4/4 Ovum: Analyst view: Facebook needs a mechanism to deliver its own services to a portfolio of devices.
• 4/4 Ovum: Analyst view: Facebook’s Android launcher better targets millions of Android users
• 4/4 HP Improves Enterprise Mobility with Cloud-based Management Solution
• 4/4 Faultline: US networks will fight Aereo all the way to Congress
• 4/4 Faultline: Ericsson makes bid to outsource global broadcasting
• 4/3 Ovum: Analyst view: Cisco’s acquisition of Ubiquisys
• 4/3 Ovum: Analyst view: EU could restrict Google’s freedom to profile consumers
• 3/28 Wireless Watch: T-Mobile’s ‘no-contract’ compromise could come to Apple’s aid

AddThis Feed Button

Amazon Ads: More Cell Phones

Barry's Books


Ads

ph.gif
ph.gif Top ph.gif

© 2008 WirelessInnovator. All rights reserved.